|
February 1996
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Houston Branch
Oil
as Commodity: A Review of The Genie Out of the Bottle
| M. A. Adelman, The
Genie Out of the Bottle: World Oil Since 1970,
Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1995. |
|
"Now that oil is a commodity..."
During the past decade in Houston, many sentences have begun
with this phrase, often to explain how a declining oil market
has changed our city's businesses, power structure, banking,
real estate and income. Morris Adelman is among the world's
most respected energy economists, and in no other city will
you find quicker agreement with the thesis of his new book—oil
is a commodity, has been a commodity throughout much of this
century and will be a commodity for a long time to come. His
book outlines the past and present implications of this thesis.
In The Genie Out of the Bottle,
Adelman denies a special status to oil as a depleting resource
or as an increasing-cost good to be conserved for future generations.
He sets out to explain the turmoil of world oil markets in
the 1970s and 1980s that resulted from OPEC's gaining power
over oil markets, power that the cartel used clumsily and
with little foresight. He sees American energy and foreign
policy often based on the mistaken notion that oil reserves
were irreplaceable and would be exhausted before the 20th
century was out. This book is an event-by-event economic history
of the last 25 years in world oil markets. It proves the power
of a market-based explanation of those times, shows how U.S.
policy often betrayed our interests and points out what good
policy might have been. As Adelman aptly concludes, the challenge
to world oil was and is one of oil abundance.
The Economics of Petroleum Supply
For some, the controversial part
of Adelman's book will be his assertion that it is not useful
to think of oil and many other minerals as subject to depletion
over time. We can be sure the doomsday environmentalist will
bring different ideas to the table. And within the economics
profession, there is a large academic literature that deals
with the optimal strategy for consuming a fixed resource base
over time. As we deplete a mineral base, its price presumably
rises year by year because of increased scarcity. Thus, supply
decisions are different for minerals, as we have to decide
how much to hold in the ground today to take advantage of
higher prices tomorrow. Adelman bluntly suggests economists
find more useful pursuits. The earth's store of any mineral
or hydrocarbon is neither knowable nor fixed in any useful
sense, he claims, and advancing technology has only occasionally
allowed the price of a mineral to rise for any extended period.
Adelman builds a powerful case that for recent oil history
and for many years into the future, the normal condition of
a competitive oil market is one of rapid expansion
of the reserve base under conditions of declining cost. If
price did not fall after 1970, it is because of OPEC market
power, not scarcity or a threat of running out of oil.
Adelman's view of the oil industry's
supply problem is one of inventory renewal. The rule of thumb
is that the industry should hold about 15 years' supply in
the ground as proven reserves, that is, recoverable at today's
prices and technology. The cost of reserves is strictly related
to the investment needed to find them, to drill and complete
the wells and connect to a pipeline or tanker terminal. As
with every other industry, you will find the value of investment
in oil by discounting future revenues over time.
Crude discovery in the United States
peaked in 1930 with 13 billion barrels in reserve. Over the
next 60 years, and outside Alaska, inventory turned over 10
times, and now 17 billion barrels are in reserve. The geology
of the United States remained unchanged during these years,
but technology kept making reserves available. Most of these
reserves came from existing reservoirs, not new field discoveries.
Adelman points out that the bread and butter of new oil supplies
is learning to delineate and exploit known fields, and important
technology has developed in this market. From 1966 to 1977,
for example, the United States added 19 billion barrels of
reserves, and 17 billion were from fields discovered before
1966. In contrast, Adelman sees new field discoveries for
oil companies as analogous to R&D undertaken by manufacturers—risky,
with highly uncertain results but with large rewards for luck
and foresight.
Adelman searches in vain for signs of
global oil scarcity. In 1970, as world oil prices hit their
all-time low of $1.21 per barrel ($4.45 in today's dollars),
Aramco paid an excise tax of 88 cents to producing governments
and kept only 33 cents, but the company's return on investment
was more than 100 percent per year. These kinds of high returns
provided adequate incentives to invest further, and extensive
plans were under way to expand OPEC reserves and producing
capacity in 1970. Adelman finds the long-run marginal cost
curves for oil available from noncommunist countries has shifted
steadily to the right and flattened out since 1955, telling
us that more oil was available each decade at a lower price.
The Genie Unbottled
The "genie" of the book's
title is the heady discovery by the producing governments
of OPEC that they could control the price of oil. Adelman
sketches the end of the old oil regime—the decline of
the United States as an oil exporter, the end of Texas Gulf
Plus as the world price of oil and the ascendancy of OPEC.
The key lever for OPEC was the ability to set and manipulate
a floor price for oil. The original concessions with producer
governments were for profit sharing, and in 1948 Venezuela
pushed this to a 50–50 split. Oil companies posted a
price to determine revenue, subtracted production costs and
then divided profit.
Any decrease in the posted price by
the oil companies, which directly cut producing government
revenues, came to be regarded by the governments as a unilateral
and regrettable decision. By the 1960 formation of OPEC, the
unspoken agreement became that the governments would set posted
price—regardless of market price. The original tax on
income became an excise tax per barrel, as market price could
fall to zero and the per barrel tax continued. The world price
of oil became "OPEC excise tax plus," in which the
pluses entailed operating and transportation costs. Tentatively
at first, then with confidence, OPEC found it could raise
the tax and raise the floor under the price of oil. Prices
might rise, but OPEC refused to let them fall.
Using Economics 101 as a backdrop, Adelman
lays out OPEC's problems as a cartel. Once in the saddle,
its first problem was to set a monopoly price, and the working
rule is to choose the closest substitute commodity and just
undercut it. The cartel chose a figure far too high. Adelman
documents that neither OPEC nor the consuming governments
understood the long-run elasticity of the demand for oil.
OPEC tried to set the price of oil just under the price of
synthetic liquid fuels from coal, shale or tar sands, aiming
at $60 per barrel or above. It ignored the possibility of
end-user conservation, which proved slow to develop but which
became the primary challenge to the cartel by the end of the
1970s. OPEC also ignored oil-on-oil competition, failing to
see the rapid and extensive development of non-OPEC resources
in Mexico, the North Sea and Alaska. Combined with end-user
conservation, non-OPEC producers taught the cartel the limits
of its power. Today's $18 oil prices still include substantial
monopoly payments for OPEC, but at levels far more modest
than the genie initially seemed to offer.
Second, and even harder, OPEC had to
manage production cuts and decide who held excess capacity.
In a competitive market, market price and comparative advantage
solve this problem, as every producer operates to the point
where marginal cost equals price. In a cartel, the producing
governments collectively win by withholding production, but
incentives are present—especially for the marginal producer—to
cheat and produce too much. The burden of holding the line
falls hard on the core of big producers, the producers that
can't cheat without hurting themselves, and in OPEC that means
Saudi Arabia. Adelman carefully documents how the allocation
burden has shifted within OPEC, first informally and then
through the quota system we see today.
Rise and Fall
The rise and fall of OPEC and oil
prices is a story well known to any Houston audience (Figure
1). Adelman's book, however, is special because it holds
the events of the last 25 years up against an unforgiving
standard of basic economics. As Nixon, Kissinger, Carter and
Yamani moved on and off the world stage, what drove their
view of oil? In retrospect, how could they have been so wrong?
Indeed, how could we all have been so wrong? A number of economists
(including Adelman) have taken credit for predicting the fall
of oil prices in the 1980s, but Adelman can find only one
formal study that correctly predicted the oil bust.
The good news is that Houstonians and Texans were not alone
in their delusion about oil prices—oil scarcity and
unlimited price increases became the perceived wisdom of the
1970s. The bad news, perhaps, is that the only study Adelman
cites (and which was widely ignored) was by three professors—George
Daly, James Griffin and Henry Steele—all then at the
University of Houston. If only we had paid attention.
However, if a villain exists for the
expensive errors made in world oil for the last 25 years,
Adelman chooses governments. Producer governments
went too far too fast in their demands, often showing the
short time horizon of unstable regimes. No matter how fast
the money came in, they spent it faster for consumption, weapons
and domestic subsidies. They proved terrible businesses, never
able to follow a basic business plan. Meanwhile consumer
governments felt trapped by looming oil scarcity. Price controls
delayed the conservation response needed to combat high prices.
American foreign policy sought "special" relationships
with the Saudis, just as the French sought out the Algerians,
in what Adelman claims was a mistaken assumption that cultivated
goodwill could somehow bring down the price of oil. New supplies
and shrinking oil demand ended the myth of oil scarcity, not
diplomacy.
Houston
Beige Book
January 1996
Houston energy companies were at the
center of a scramble to deliver heating oil and natural gas
to the Midwest and East Coast in December and January. A series
of winter storms stressed energy distribution systems, which
were further hindered by mechanical and labor problems at
some refineries, storms in the North Sea and Gulf of Mexico
and cold weather in Europe. Delivery generally proved reliable,
but energy prices rose sharply and then seesawed widely as
bad weather came and went.
Retail Sales and Autos
The Houston shopper was the big
winner over the holiday season, as stores kept long hours
and offered tremendous markdowns. At a time the city is experiencing
good job growth, the problem seems to be too many stores.
None of the big chains met its plan for the holidays, and
few matched 1994.
Meanwhile, November auto sales were
up 16 percent from their year-ago level, resulting in a record
November for Houston dealers. Year-to-date sales were up 6
percent over 1994.
Oil Field Equipment and Services
Demand for oil field equipment
and products remains flat but at profitable levels, with good
prices and no inventory problems. The year-end flurry of drilling
activity that marked many past years failed to materialize
in 1995. Respondents credited a combination of improved management
techniques, better control of capital budgets and the absence
of expiring tax credits to capture. Low levels of domestic
drilling onshore continue to be offset by high levels of activity
and rising day-rates for rigs in the Gulf of Mexico. International
opportunities continue to grow, especially in Latin America.
Petrochemicals and Refining
Commodity chemical markets continue
to weaken, with production and consumption down in the fourth
quarter compared with earlier in 1995. Prices and operating
rates continue to fall. Despite the drop in operating rates,
inventories remain under control. Products closer to the consumer—plastic
and synthetic rubber—are performing better, with stable
prices and production turning up. Both gasoline and heating
oil prices began to rise in mid-November. The refining industry
entered the heating season with low crude inventories, partly
to save costs after several warm winters and partly to avoid
potential losses on inventory valuation after the November
OPEC meeting. By mid-December, cold weather pulled crude inventories
below 10 million barrels, or 6.4 percent below 1994's level.
In mid-December, large oil product pipelines to the East Coast
placed fuel oil and other customers on allocation.
Gasoline prices' November rise initially
began with the shutdown of a large facility for blending winter
fuels. They continued to rise as refinery capacity tightened
due to potential labor problems and cold weather. The result
was improving refinery margins through December, and refiners
raised throughput to take advantage of these profits. The
price of crude oil briefly moved over $20 per barrel, following
product prices upward.
Natural Gas Prices
Natural gas is a local fuel, with
its value often determined by its access to market by pipeline.
Natural gas prices set records on the New York futures market
in December and at the Henry Hub in Louisiana, where physical
settlement for New York futures contracts takes place. Across
the nation and the Eleventh District, however, gas prices
varied widely, depending on pipeline access to the East Coast.
While prices peaked at $3.50 or more in Louisiana, prices
at the Katy Hub near Houston were close to $2 per thousand
cubic feet. Prices in the Rocky Mountains were closer to $1
to $1.50.
Houston Real Estate
Despite good job growth, respondents
continue to report that local real estate remains flat. The
exceptions are quality warehouse space and single-family housing.
New and used home sales continue to be strong, and 1996 may
offer Houston home builders their first chance in 10 years
to enjoy both favorable interest rates and local job growth.
| About Houston
Business
For more information or
copies of this publication, contact Bill Gilmer
at (713) 652-1546 or bill.gilmer@dal.frb.org,
or write to Bill Gilmer, Houston Branch, Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas, P.O. Box 2578, Houston,
Texas 77252. This publication is available on
the Internet at www.dallasfed.org.
The views expressed are
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect
the positions of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
or the Federal Reserve System. |
|
|