|
Third Quarter 1996
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
| Economic Review
was published until 1999. |
|
Corporate Finance
in International Perspective: Legal and Regulatory Influences
on Financial System Development
Stephen D. Prowse
In the postwar period, systems
of corporate finance and governance have emerged in
the United States, Japan, and Germany that are dramatically
different from one another. To date, there has been
little focus on why. Stephen Prowse argues that differences
in three aspects of the legal and regulatory environments
in these countries are responsible. First, the severity
of legal and regulatory restraints on financial institutions
being "active" investors in firms. Second,
the degree to which corporate securities markets are
suppressed by regulation. Finally, the degree to which
securities markets are "passively" suppressed
by the absence of mandated disclosure requirements.
Prowse compares the merits of
each system and argues that the U.S. system may be more
favorable to the growth of high-technology firms. He
discusses the future evolution of each system. The German
and Japanese regulatory environments are changing rapidly
to increase the role of securities markets in corporate
finance. The U.S. environment is also changing to give
financial institutions more latitude to be active investors
in firms. Over the long term, the regulatory environments
of all three countries appear to be converging. The
focal point of this convergence is an entirely new environment
in which financial institutions are free to be active
investors and corporate securities markets are unhindered
by regulatory obstacles.
Capacity Utilization
as a Real-Time Predictor of Manufacturing Output
Evan F. Koenig
In this article, Evan F. Koenig
demonstrates that the Federal Reserve Board's initial
estimate of manufacturing capacity utilization is helpful
in predicting subsequent growth in manufacturing output.
Together with lagged real-time output growth and growth
in the composite index of leading indicators, capacity
utilization explains more than 50 percent of the variation
in output growth at a four-quarter horizon. Based on
data available at the beginning of the year, the forecasting
equation predicts little or no growth in manufacturing
output during 1996.
Externalities,
Markets, and Government Policy
Roy J. Ruffin
Before the work of Ronald Coase,
economists argued that externalities-unpriced benefits
or costs-constituted the main exception to the rule
that Adam Smith's invisible hand will efficiently allocate
resources. Coase showed that externalities may or may
not require a government solution, depending on the
institutional setting of the problems and the size of
transaction costs. Moreover, even in the absence of
externalities, market transactions require low transaction
costs. Firms exist to economize on those costs. In shifting
the terms of the debate, Coase single-handedly moved
economics from presuming specific roles for government
action to a more neutral position requiring detailed
analysis. In this article, Roy Ruffin explains Coase's
contribution to understanding the role of government.
|