RELATED ARTICLES
"The New Budget Outlook: Policymakers Respond to the Surplus," Economic & Financial Review, Second Quarter 1999 (Text or PDF)
"The Federal Budget Surplus: Pleasant Surprises and New Choices," In Depth, January 1999 (PDF)

U.S. Economy
The Federal Budget Surplus Surprise

Dallas Fed Senior Economist Alan Viard discusses the sources of the federal budget surplus that took legislators by surprise.

The federal budget landscape has changed dramatically during the last six years. After a steady decline in the deficit from 1993 to 1996, a budget “surprise” unexpectedly brought the budget close to balance in 1997 and moved it into surplus in 1998 for the first time in 29 years. The deficit decline and the move into surplus resulted from a combination of factors, including a surge in individual income tax receipts, slower growth of medical costs, lower interest rates, economic growth and the 1990 and 1993 deficit-reduction laws.

These events, combined with legislation adopted in 1997, have produced a new budget outlook. If current policies are maintained, surpluses are expected to continue for 20 years, completely retiring the outstanding federal debt. However, deficits are expected to reappear after 2020 due to rising Social Security and medical spending.

The steady deficit decline from 1993 to 1996 was followed by a surprise that moved the budget close to balance in 1997 and into surplus in 1998. To appreciate the magnitude of this budget surplus surprise, it is necessary to understand what forecasters expected in 1996.

Although the deficit had declined for four consecutive years, forecasters expected it to begin rising again. Figure 1 charts budget projections for fiscal years 1997–99 made at various dates by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). (The projections assumed there would be no changes in tax and entitlement laws and that discretionary spending would equal the Budget Enforcement Act cap until it expired.) In May 1996, CBO projected deficits of about $200 billion for 1997–99. Although there were no major relevant policy changes, persistent good news repeatedly forced CBO to alter its forecasts. Fiscal 1997 ended with a deficit of only $22 billion and 1998 with a surplus of $69 billion; CBO now projects a $107 billion surplus in 1999. The magnitude of these forecast deviations is unprecedented.

Analysts are still trying to fully explain the budget surplus surprise, but several factors emerge from a comparison of the actual fiscal 1998 budget outcome with the May 1996 CBO projection. One-third of the forecast deviation was caused by an overestimate of outlays. Almost half of the outlay overestimate was in Medicare and Medicaid, reflecting the continued slower growth of medical costs. Interest outlays also were lower than predicted, reflecting both lower debt and lower nominal interest rates.

Two-thirds of the deviation was caused by an underestimate of receipts, primarily reflecting an unexpected surge in individual income tax receipts. Income tax receipts were boosted by strong economic growth and by several other factors, as discussed by CBO. Income from partnerships and S corporations rose sharply, and wages and salaries grew most rapidly in the highest tax brackets. One important factor was the rapid rise of net capital gains realizations, which largely reflected the recent stock market boom. The stock market’s continued strength suggests that realizations remained high in 1998, boosting fiscal 1999 receipts.

The budget surplus surprise, combined with new legislation adopted on August 5, 1997, has profoundly altered the budget outlook. In 1996, CBO’s 10-year forecast projected large and growing deficits. Now, the 10-year forecast predicts large and growing surpluses if current policies are maintained, as shown in Figure 2. CBO’s longer term projections predict that surpluses will continue for an additional decade after 2009 but that deficits will reemerge after 2020.


NOTE:
The budget laws divide noninterest spending into two categories: discretionary and entitlement programs. Discretionary programs may continue to operate only if Congress and the president approve their funding through annual appropriation bills. Half of all discretionary spending currently goes to national defense, with the rest funding a wide range of programs such as highways, law enforcement, and national parks. Entitlement programs do not require annual appropriations because Congress and the president have permanently authorized them to pay benefits to eligible individuals based on formulas set by law. These programs may operate indefinitely, unless Congress and the president change the underlying laws. Three-quarters of entitlement spending goes to Social Security, Medicare, and the federal share of Medicaid. The other quarter is devoted to a range of smaller programs, including veterans' benefits, unemployment compensation, farm subsidies, and welfare.

Alan Viard is a senior economist and policy advisor at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Viard, Alan (1999), "The Federal Budget Surplus Surprise," Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Expand Your Insight, August 1, http://www.dallasfed.org/eyi/usecon/9908surplus.html

About EYI | Global Economy | U.S. Economy | Regional Economy | Free Enterprise | Money & Banking | Technology
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas | FRB Dallas Publications