| RELATED
ARTICLES |
 |
| "Border
Region Makes Progress in the 1990s,"
Vista, Dec. 1999 (Text or PDF)
|
 |
| "The
Binational Importance of the Maquiladora Industry,"
Southwest Economy, Nov./Dec. 1999 (Text or PDF)
|
|
|
|
Regional
Economy
Better on the Border?
San Antonio Branch Senior Economist Keith Phillips reviews the recent
economic performance of the Texas border region.
The 1990s have
been eventful for the Border Region (Chart 1). The North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) became effective in January 1994. A
significant peso devaluation in December 1994 was followed by a
sharp recession in Mexico in 1995. After increasing strongly in
1994, employment growth slowed significantly in 1995. Job growth
rebounded in 1996 and continued to pick up strength until the second
half of 1998, when a steep decline in oil prices hit the oil-dependent
areas of the border and caused some slowing in the Mexican economy.

SOURCE:
Texas State Comptroller |
Overall, however,
the 1990s marked a period of progress for the border economy. Gains
in state funding for public education and increased funding for
Border Patrol and Customs created many new high-paying jobs. The
maquiladora industry (mostly foreign-owned industrial plants on
the Mexican side of the border) boomed, increasing demand for retail
and banking services on the Texas side of the border. And while
NAFTA may have played a role in the decline of apparel manufacturing
and other low-skilled industries, transportation and warehousing
got a boost from strong gains in trade.
The most recent
income data show that border earnings per job rose at an average
annual rate of 3.9 percent from 1990 through 1997, versus 3.5 percent
in the nation. During the 1980s, border growth was slower than the
nation's. Average earnings growth varied from a low of 3.5 percent
for Brownsville to 5 percent for Laredo. No border metro area grew
more slowly than the national average (Chart 2).
Chart
2
 |
Job growth also
has been strong in the 1990s. From 1990 through 1997 annual job
growth averaged 2.8 percent for the entire border region, versus
1.6 percent in the nation. Job Growth in the metropolitan areas
ranged from 1.9 percent in El Paso to 5 percent in Laredo (Chart
2). In 1990 El Paso had a larger share of employment in manufacturing
than any other border metropolitan area; hence, it has been hit
hard by losses in apparel manufacturing. Laredo, on the other hand,
has the largest share of employment in transportation services and
has benefited from being the biggest land port for trade between
Texas and Mexico. Total shipments through the Port of Laredo increased
89.5 percent from 1994 to 1997 and, in 1997, were valued at about
$50 billiontwice the amount of goods traveling through El
Paso, the next largest land port.
NAFTA's implementation,
a mid-decade peso devaluation and Mexican recession, and strength
in the Mexican maquiladora industry have left their mark on the
border region during the 1990s. Earnings per job and the number
of jobs have increased at a faster pace than the national average,
allowing this low-wage region to make small relative gains.
|
Keith
Phillips is a senior economist at the San Antonio Branch
of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
SUGGESTED
CITATION:
Phillips,
Keith (2000), "Better on the Border?," Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas Expand Your Insight, May
1, http://www.dallasfed.org/eyi/regional/0005.html
|
|
About
EYI | Global Economy
| U.S. Economy |
Regional Economy
| Free Enterprise
| Money & Banking
| Technology
Federal Reserve Bank of
Dallas | FRB
Dallas Publications
|