| Global
Economy
The
Effects of SARS on East Asian Economies
Jahyeong Koo
and Dong Fu look at the economic impact that SARS has had on major
countries in East Asia.
Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) has recently sent a shock wave across
East Asia. Now, after nearly 800 deaths worldwide, SARS seems finally
to be under control. There are currently fewer than 1,000 probable
SARS cases in the world (Table 1). Despite the serious
emotional distress it has caused, SARS appears to have had limited
and temporary economic impacts in the region.
| Table
1 |
| SARS
Probable Cases by Country (June 12, 2003) |
| Country |
Cumulative
Cases |
Deaths |
Current
Cases |
| Australia |
5 |
0 |
0 |
| Canada |
238 |
32 |
65 |
| China |
5,328 |
343 |
528 |
| Hong
Kong |
1,755 |
291 |
87 |
| Japan |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| South
Korea |
3 |
0 |
0 |
| Taiwan |
688 |
81 |
260 |
| Mongolia |
9 |
0 |
0 |
| Philippines |
14 |
2 |
12 |
| Singapore |
206 |
31 |
5 |
| Thailand |
9 |
2 |
1 |
| United
States |
70 |
0 |
34 |
| Vietnam |
63 |
5 |
0 |
| Other |
57 |
3 |
4 |
| World
Total |
8,445 |
790 |
996 |
| Source:
World Health Organization. |
Mainland
China
In the
first quarter of 2003, China posted its fastest growth in years—9.9
percent. Since then, the SARS outbreak has put a dent in both consumption
and investment. The China Statistical Information Center recently
forecast 8.3 percent growth for the second quarter. The Asian Development
Bank estimates China’s annual growth rate will fall by 0.2
percentage points from its original estimate of 7.5 percent.
The Chinese
government’s damage control with respect to SARS seems to
be gradually working, aided by rising temperatures as summer arrives.
Most major cities have calmed down considerably, although the inner
provinces are still facing a more uncertain situation. Businesses
lost some of the most important holiday sales around May 1. However,
with new cases declining, domestic consumption may enjoy a post-SARS
perk-up. So far there hasn’t been any major disruption to
international trade (Chart 1). Any lagging effect won’t
show up until coming quarters.
Chart
1
 |
In general,
the SARS problem can be characterized as a temporary demand shock
to China. As long as investors’ confidence in China’s
long-term economic growth doesn’t diminish, China’s
trade and capital conditions won’t be significantly affected
by the epidemic. Meanwhile, the government is still going to rely
heavily on fiscal measures to combat any perceived slowdown.
Hong
Kong
Hong Kong has been hardest hit by SARS, judging from the relatively
high ratio of the number of contracted cases relative to the population.
Until the first quarter, Hong Kong’s economy seemed to be
recovering. Now the recovery could be cut short because of SARS
(Chart 2).
Chart
2
 |
Taiwan
Taiwanese-invested
companies in mainland China have enjoyed explosive growth in the
past decade. Cross-strait trade is booming despite constant political
fights between the two sides. SARS is just one more factor to be
considered in the uneasy relationship. Taiwan nonetheless has a
better control of SARS due to its modern medical infrastructure
and a more open political and social environment.
Larger problems
than SARS in the mid- to long term are the political uncertainty
within the island and its relationship with China. With a presidential
election coming in about a year, the economy will be the crucial
issue for both pro-independence and pro-unification parties (Chart
3).
Chart
3
 |
South
Korea
South
Korea, a poster child for the world economy last year, is falling
into recession, registering two consecutive quarters of negative
growth since first quarter 2003. In spite of Korea’s geographical
proximity to China, SARS is not a major source of the country’s
economic hardship.
First, there
have been only three probable SARS cases and no deaths so far in
Korea. In a country with many risks other than the epidemic, the
influence of SARS on domestic demand is negligible. For example,
worldwide SARS deaths total just 10 percent of Korea's traffic fatalities
in 2001. Second, the growth of Korean exports to China slowed in
May, but not by enough to explain the economic downfall. Year-over-year
export growth was 29.3 percent and is expected to return to trend
quickly (Chart 4). Korea’s current recession originated
mostly from its own economic policies.
Chart
4
 |
Japan
Japan’s economy is even less influenced by SARS than
is Korea's. No SARS cases have been reported in Japan. In addition,
China is simply not as important a trading partner to Japan as it
is to Korea. Even though Japan has thus far been able to ward off
the SARS contagion, its economy has languished, growing only 0.6
percent in the first quarter. Deflation persists but appears to
be moderating.
Conclusion
On June 24, the World Health Organization removed the last city,
Beijing, from its travel warning list because conditions there have
improved significantly. Looking back, the negative effect of SARS
is seen clearly in cities such as Hong Kong and Beijing. However,
people in the East Asian region generally face many serious risk
factors other than SARS, from traffic accidents to political uncertainty.
Overall the influence of SARS is likely to be limited and temporary.
|
Koo is an economist and Fu is an assistant economist
in the Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank
of Dallas.
SUGGESTED
CITATION:
Koo,
Jahyeong, and Dong Fu (2003), "The Effects of SARS
on East Asian Economies," Federal Reserve Bank
of Dallas Expand Your Insight, July 1, http://www.dallasfed.org/eyi/global/0307sars.html
|
|
About
EYI | Global Economy
| U.S. Economy |
Regional Economy
| Free Enterprise
| Money & Banking
| Technology
Federal Reserve Bank of
Dallas | FRB
Dallas Publications
|