|
May 23, 2007
The Texas economy expanded steadily
in April. The Dallas Fed’s Texas
Business-Cycle Index, an aggregate measure of the
region’s current economic activity, rose at an
annualized rate of 3.7 percent, matching the pace set
year-to-date (Chart 1).
Chart 1
|
State employment increased by
18,600 workers in April—for annualized growth
of 2.2 percent, according to data released by the Texas
Workforce Commission with seasonal and other adjustments by the Dallas Fed [3] (see table). The labor market continued
to tighten during the month—the Texas unemployment
rate fell one-tenth of a percentage point to 4.2 percent.
Major Metros
Austin’s
economy grew swiftly in April, its business-cycle
index registering an 8.8 percent increase and employment
expanding at a 2.9 percent pace. Continued business
expansions and relocations boosted office and industrial
occupancy rates and kept job growth positive in the
trade and transportation and construction sectors, which
added 500 and 400 jobs to payrolls, respectively. Healthy
population growth bolstered demand for housing and improved
apartment occupancy rates in the metro. Additionally,
an expanding tourism industry led to job gains of 500
in the leisure and hospitality sector during the month.
The Dallas economy
grew solidly in April, with its business-cycle
index posing a robust 3.8 percent increase. Employers
added 6,500 positions during the month, the most of
any metro. Job gains were broadly based across industries,
with professional and business services and financial
activities leading the way. The two industries added
1,700 and 1,400 jobs, respectively—and their growth
is helping bolster demand for office space. The large
trade, transportation and utilities sector continued
to expand during the month. Several upcoming transportation
and warehousing projects are under way in the metro:
Old Dominion Freight Line’s construction of a
new 250-door terminal and the development of the Dallas
Logistics Hub—a 6,000 acre distribution and manufacturing
facility adjacent to Union Pacific’s Southern
Dallas Intermodal Terminal, connecting with four major
highways.
Fort Worth’s
economy maintained its strong growth in April. Its business-cycle
index rose at a rate of 6.3 percent, and payroll
gains totaled 4,300 during the month, the second-largest
increase among metros. Job increases in the service-producing
sector offset a slight decline in the goods sector,
which was likely related to a drop in area housing construction.
The largest increase—2,200 jobs—came in
professional and business services, which includes architectural
firms, accounting companies, law firms and computer
system design firms. An ongoing industrial expansion
boosted payrolls by 1,400 in the trade, transportation
and utilities sector.
The Houston economy
decelerated in April. Its business-cycle
index grew at an annualized rate of 3.6 percent,
following an increase of 6.4 percent in March. Employers
added 3,400 jobs during the month. Continued strength
in the energy sector boosted payrolls in the construction
and mining sector and architecture and engineering services
by 1,000 and 700 jobs, respectively. Growth in the global
economy benefited Houston—the nation’s largest
port in international tonnage—by supporting job
growth of 1,000 in the trade, transportation and utilities
sector during the month. Houston’s manufacturing
sector weakened further, with job losses of 1,700 in
April and 2,700 year-to-date.
San Antonio’s
economy remained vibrant in April. Its business-cycle
index increased 6.7 percent, supported by job growth
of 4.1 percent during the month. Employment growth in
the leisure and hospitality sector remained strong,
adding 2,100 jobs. Continued business relocations kept
office space absorption positive and contributed to
job gains in the professional and business services
sector. Construction employment rose by 200, as industrial
and commercial building activity offset a slowdown in
the housing industry. Commercial projects under way
include a $20 million endocrine research center, a $10
million tech center and an expansion at Northwest Vista
College.
Border Metros
Brownsville’s
economy grew at a moderate pace in April, with its business-cycle
index rising 2.7 percent, while employment increased
by 1 percent (Chart 2). Brownsville continues
to be an attractive destination for retailers, with
Kohl’s and Conn’s set to open new locations.
Strong population growth has led to healthy job gains
in the leisure and hospitality and the educational and
health care industries.
Chart 2
|
El Paso's economy
grew steadily in April, with the metro’s business-cycle
index increasing 2.6 percent. Total employment remained
flat, as gains in service-producing employment were
offset by losses in the goods-producing sector. Business
contacts noted a manufacturing deceleration in Ciudad
Juárez that may have a negative impact on El
Paso’s economy over the next few months.
Laredo’s
economic activity continued to show some signs of strength
in April, with its business-cycle
index posting a 6.1 percent annualized increase.
Total metro employment fell by 100 jobs during the month—a
1.4 percent rate—but is up 0.7 percent year-to-date.
Retail sector activity slowed due to unfavorable weather
conditions. Commercial border crossings continued to
decline, which business contacts attributed to the high
crime rate in Nuevo Laredo and a slowdown of the maquiladora
industry in Mexico. On the plus side, the professional
and business services sector added 100 jobs, and a new
H-E-B Plus that opened in April created over 400 jobs.
McAllen’s
economy continued to post strong growth in April, with
its business-cycle
index rising 5.6 percent and employment expanding
by 4.7 percent. Healthy population growth fueled activity
in the retail sector and boosted health care employment
growth. Commercial building activity remains vigorous,
with the expansion of a major medical facility under
way, and construction of an $80 million mall—Shoppes
at Rio Grande Valley—scheduled to begin in June.
| Texas Metro Employment and Unemployment,
Seasonally Adjusted |
| |
Jan
07 |
Feb
07 |
Mar
07 |
Apr
07 |
|
Apr
minus Mar |
Apr
minus
Dec 06 |
|
Apr/
Mar |
Apr/
Dec
06 |
Apr
07 |
| |
(in
thousands) |
|
(in
thousands) |
|
(percent,
annualized) |
Unem-
ploy-
ment
Rate |
|
10224.2 |
10253.3 |
10268.7 |
10287.3 |
|
18.6 |
62 |
|
2.20 |
1.83 |
4.2 |
|
65.5 |
65.6 |
65.9 |
65.9 |
|
0 |
0.6 |
|
0.00 |
2.78 |
3.4 |
|
111.5 |
111.3 |
111.6 |
111.8 |
|
0.2 |
1 |
|
2.17 |
2.73 |
3.4 |
|
742.2 |
745.1 |
747.6 |
749.4 |
|
1.8 |
8.7 |
|
2.93 |
3.57 |
3.3 |
|
166.5 |
166.5 |
166.1 |
165.8 |
|
-0.3 |
2.9 |
|
-2.15 |
5.44 |
5.3 |
|
122.7 |
122.8 |
123 |
123.1 |
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
0.98 |
0.49 |
5.7 |
|
91.9 |
91.1 |
91.1 |
91.1 |
|
0 |
-0.7 |
|
0.00 |
-2.27 |
3.4 |
|
175.8 |
176.1 |
176.1 |
176.1 |
|
0 |
0.7 |
|
0.00 |
1.20 |
4.2 |
|
2067.1 |
2072.8 |
2076.1 |
2082.6 |
|
6.5 |
18.4 |
|
3.82 |
2.70 |
4 |
|
264 |
264.2 |
265.1 |
265.1 |
|
0 |
-0.6 |
|
0.00 |
-0.68 |
5.8 |
|
844.2 |
845.8 |
850 |
854.3 |
|
4.3 |
7 |
|
6.24 |
2.50 |
4 |
|
2499.3 |
2501.1 |
2508.8 |
2512.2 |
|
3.4 |
14.3 |
|
1.64 |
1.73 |
4 |
|
120.7 |
120.8 |
121 |
121.5 |
|
0.5 |
0.3 |
|
5.07 |
0.74 |
4.4 |
|
84.7 |
84.6 |
85.1 |
85 |
|
-0.1 |
0.2 |
|
-1.40 |
0.71 |
4.4 |
|
92.9 |
92.8 |
92.4 |
92.8 |
|
0.4 |
-0.1 |
|
5.32 |
-0.32 |
3.7 |
|
130 |
130.5 |
130 |
130.4 |
|
0.4 |
1.2 |
|
3.76 |
2.81 |
3.3 |
|
209.6 |
210.1 |
210.8 |
211.6 |
|
0.8 |
3.8 |
|
4.65 |
5.59 |
6.5 |
|
122.8 |
123.8 |
124.1 |
124.2 |
|
0.1 |
2.4 |
|
0.97 |
6.03 |
2.9 |
|
44.4 |
44.1 |
44.2 |
44.3 |
|
0.1 |
-0.1 |
|
2.75 |
-0.67 |
3.5 |
|
829 |
827.9 |
828.3 |
831.1 |
|
2.8 |
5 |
|
4.13 |
1.83 |
3.8 |
|
44.5 |
44.6 |
44.5 |
44.8 |
|
0.3 |
0.4 |
|
8.40 |
2.73 |
4.2 |
|
56.2 |
56.2 |
56.2 |
56.3 |
|
0.1 |
0.4 |
|
2.16 |
2.16 |
4.6 |
|
94 |
94 |
93.6 |
93.4 |
|
-0.2 |
1.9 |
|
-2.53 |
6.36 |
4 |
|
50.7 |
51 |
51.2 |
51.4 |
|
0.2 |
1 |
|
4.79 |
6.07 |
3.5 |
|
105.8 |
106.2 |
105.9 |
105.8 |
|
-0.1 |
-0.9 |
|
-1.13 |
-2.51 |
4 |
|
62.7 |
62.7 |
62.9 |
62.8 |
|
-0.1 |
0.3 |
|
-1.89 |
1.45 |
3.9 |
|
 |
| Notes
- All growth rates are annualized unless
otherwise noted.
- For a definition of the Texas Business-Cycle
Index, see Data Basics, Data
Definitions. For more detail about
the Texas metro business-cycle indexes,
see
"Dallas Fed Introduces Business-Cycle
Indexes for Texas Metros," Southwest
Economy, May/June 2005.
- The employment data used in this analysis have been benchmarked to TWC's fourth quarter 2006 by the Texas Workforce
Commission, with seasonal and other adjustments by
the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. For
more information about early benchmarking
data, see “Getting
a Jump on Texas Employment Revisions,”
Southwest Economy, November/December
2005.
- For more information regarding the importance
of seasonal adjustment of economic data,
see Data Basics, "Seasonally
Adjusting Data." For more information
about the procedure used to seasonally
adjust metro-level data, see "Reassessing
Texas Employment Growth,"
Southwest Economy, July/August 1993.
For additional
information or questions, please contact
Laila Assanie at (214) 922-5191. |
 |
|
|