|
September 1998
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
| Financial Industry
Studies is no
longer published in hard copy. For articles on financial industry-related issues, visit the publications page. |
|
How Might Financial Institutions React
to Glass-Steagall Repeal? Evidence from the Stock Market
David P. Ely and Kenneth J. Robinson
Passage of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1933
separated commercial and investment banking activities in U.S. financial
markets. After several unsuccessful attempts in Congress to repeal Glass-Steagall,
the Federal Reserve Board more than doubled the revenue commercial banking
organizations may earn from certain securities activities. David Ely and
Kenneth Robinson use this increase as a proxy for how repeal of Glass-Steagall
might affect financial institutions. The authors' results show that the
stock market reacted favorably to the revenue-limit increase for banking
organizations already active in securities activities. The stock price
of investment banks, as a group, did not seem to be significantly affected.
However, the authors find some evidence that smaller, more profitable
investment banks' stock prices reacted positively to commercial banks'
greater securities powers. This result is consistent with these investment
banks' greater attractiveness as takeover targets.![Read more about "How Might Financial Institutions React to Glass-Steagall Repeal? Evidence from the Stock Market" [PDF]](../../images/more.gif)
Managing Cross-Border Settlement
Risk: The Case of Mexican ADRs
Sujit "Bob" Chakravorti
The Mexican securities clearance and settlement
system is ahead of many markets in terms of having one of the shortest
settlement periods. However, cross-border transactions-such as those involving
American Depositary Receipts-have tended to be associated with a greater
number of settlement fails than purely domestic transactions because U.S.
and other foreign markets have longer settlement periods. This article
investigates reforms to the Mexican securities clearance and settlement
system that are aimed at improving liquidity and efficiency while maintaining
safety and reducing both general and cross-border settlement fails. These
reforms include penalties for late settlement and the establishment of
an electronic lending facility. In addition, a proposed clearinghouse
would bilaterally net securities transactions that involve the same type
of security. ![Read more about "Managing Cross-Border Settlement Risk: The Case of Mexican ADRs" [PDF]](../../images/more.gif)
|